Conversation
Notices
!identica now shows all my registered OpenID addresses. Somewhat of a privacy violation and they assume they are all valid URLs. forgot XRI
@duck1123 ain't that the idea of OpenID addresses that they should be as open and visible as possible? And if you got feedback, you should send it to @evan: http://identi.ca/notice/95268982
@habi I'm not sure that's the idea. More like you should be able to set the privacy level per #OpenID.
@lnxwalt140 I was thinking that #OpenID should be as visible as possible. And thus be one of the single ways to sign in everywhere(TM)
@habi Your private website or webmail acct could be an OpenID. Not necessarily okay to disseminate it.
@lnxwalt140 not necessarily, I agree. But in certain cases desirably. Give feedback on this to Evan, he was asking for it: http://identi.ca/notice/95268982
I'm listening, don't worry! It's a best-practice to allow opting out of OpenID display; I've got a fix coming in <1hr.
@evan i'm all for it, especially since I really think that everyone and their siblings should use #OpenID for all login purposes. And not give in to the all-to-ubiquitoous "Log in with Facebook" and "Log in with Twitter".
@habi @evan I prefer to log in with distinct accounts; logging in with another account seems dreadfully insecure
Why's that?
@evan It's that "all the eggs are in one basket thing" ... when one account gets hacked, all are at risk
it doesnt help that most people only use a single password for everything.
@coyo Yes, that's a problem that's part of the problem most people don't understand why not to.
@coyo problem made worse when those entrusted with our personal info being more concerned with the appearance of security than real security
@coyo Security Questions routinely include "mother's maiden name" which is outrageous, since its a matter of public record.
@coyo the only way security questions are secure if your answer is actually the answer to a different question #becomescumbersomequickly
I like OpenID because I can make sure that the login mechanisms I use are actually decent.
@evan I know enough to be careful; but knowing what is decent is far more difficult for non-tech folks.
@ I've heard OpenID is good, but this thread made me thing Google has something to do with it... is that true?
Google is an OpenID provider, but it didn't invent OpenID.
@evan My concern is if Google has access to OpenId data; my thinking is Google knows far too much about all of us already w/o giving more
If you use a Google OpenID, yes. If you don't, no.
think ;o
But you only have to change your credentials once after you become aware of the situation.
@zoowar if you have a lot of accounts, that can still be a lot of breaches, even in the short space until you discover it
@laurelrusswurm if you would use google as an #OpenID provider you could use their 2-step-authentification security, making it extremely unlikely that someone can breach your account.
@laurelrusswurm I think it is more secure than having accounts on fifty different sites.
I prefer https://browserid.org/ to openid. Neither is gaining traction because google and facebook track you better when you're logged in.
@zoowar #OpenID is getting traction, but noone talks about it - they implement it silently and then you get things like 'login with Steam'
@zoowar Depends on what you mean by "traction"… everyone and their dog is an #OpenID provider, but very few relying parties
That's the point. Providers have usurped openid into their walled gardens.
Implementing a provider is not implementing openid.
Now, wait a minute. Though they don't announce it as OpenID and often restrict to just a few providers, lots of sites using #OpenID logins.
The only site I use that supported "unbiased" openid is Hacker News. They ditched it a month back. http://ur1.ca/9r6pq
Of course identi.ca supports it, but i don't authenticate with it.
I also wish the sites that do use it supported user@site syntax along with url syntax.
It is true that they are misusing what should be site-independent logins, but they are using #OpenID behind the curtains.
@evan and thinking a wee bit more about it: I really should get to making http://davidhaberthür.ch/ my #OpenID presence/provider instead of relying on yahoo/Google...
@habi Take a look at SimpleID. I’ve got an instance running on my site and I’ve switched everything to using it as my OpenID provider. It rocks. :)
@jpope #OLD.NOTICE.ALARM I couldn't get SimpleID to run on my shared host at cyon.ch. So I'll keep relying on third party OpenID providers...
@habi Well, that stinks. I’m currently in the process in migrating to nginx and haven’t gotten mine working again. :(
that's really public. o.o
@coyo it's in the publicly available swiss phone book anyways (http://is.gd/hmDy3W), so there's no need to hide my data. I can understand if someone would want to hide theirs, though...
Thanks. Is it a privacy violation? I'll add a flag to hide them if you want to. Ditto Twitter, Facebook accounts.
Yes, ISTR there's a transform from XRI to URL but I can't remember what it is.
@evan Personally, I don't really care, but I can see how some might be upset about having those previously private relations made public.
there should be flags for privacy, that's a pretty good idea. exposing all data publically by default may not be the best policy.
That's the facebook policy.
Understood. Flag forthcoming.
OK, there's a flag on identi.ca now to hide OpenIDs from your profile page. It's in the openid settings panel.
@evan Thanks for getting on that. Not that I'll use it, but on behalf of the paranoids, I thank you.
I think, though, that this should be required reading RE #OpenID: http://ur1.ca/9r3ov